 | | AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
Here are two new space MOCs: The AF-Maelstrom; (URL) was an experiment in fuslage(sp?) construction and didn't turn out half bad. The Deepsnoop MKI; (URL) was an experiment to see what I could do with a brown and white color scheme. I really like (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
(...) My my... TWO very cool MOCs from Kirby! ;-D (...) Close, it's "fuselage"... :-) What really struck me as great, on this MOC, are the front angled wings, and the engines. Slick Mr. Warden, slick... I wanna see MORE pics! (...) Yah, the colour (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
(...) Hmm...I'm not sure what you mean, there actually aren't any front-angled wings...I used a couple of wings in place of slopes behind the canopy to smooth things out and fill up space. The rear wings dip downward, but aren't angled forward at (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
(...) Nice - I don't think conventionally shaped fighters get enough respect here in .space. Jeff J (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
Thanks! I think the conventional-looking/near future fighters are a bit more difficult because they have to look like "real" fighters. But maybe that's just me. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
I'm intrigued about the configuration of the engines on the Maelstrom. I like what I think is an integrated tailfin and exhaust. Is this the case? Good (and profitable) experiment. Cheers, -G (...) (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
|
(...) Ummm...I guess. Not really sure what you're talking about. The fins are attached to the exhaust/engines... (...) Thanks, glad you liked it!! (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
