Subject:
|
Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:34:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
344 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Thanks! I think the conventional-looking/near future fighters are a bit
more difficult because they have to look like "real" fighters. But maybe
that's just me.
In lugnet.space, Jeff Jardine writes:
> In lugnet.space, Kirby Warden writes:
>
> > The AF-Maelstrom;
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=22402
>
>
> Nice - I don't think conventionally shaped fighters get enough respect here
> in .space.
>
> Jeff J
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread: ![AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI -Kirby Warden (31-Jul-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI -Mladen Pejic (31-Jul-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI -Kirby Warden (31-Jul-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI -Jeff Jardine (1-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI -Gil Shaw (1-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: AF-Maelstrom/Deepsnoop MKI -Kirby Warden (2-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|