 | | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com —Alexander Zwagerman
|
| | | I'm with Mark on this one. Although LEGO is great for learning maths and logical thinking (I have used LEGO in the classroom, being a teacher), it's basic strength is enabling one to be creative. Creativity must lie within the limits of the product (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com —Luke Ma
|
| | | | | "Alexander Zwagerman" <alexander@zwagerman.net> wrote in message news:H036vr.BAo@lugnet.com... (...) it's (...) I don't think theory describes only the limits of anything it's trying to describe. Most would agree that music is in essence a creative (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com —Damien Guichard
|
| | | | | | (...) Hi Luke, Exactly my position. Don't be blasé but don't expect something grandiose. Thanks for your support, Damien (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com —Damien Guichard
|
| | | | (...) Hi Alexander, My lego calculus does not describe limits of lego bricks. Describing limits of lego bricks is the purpose of the LCD project (URL) specifications will be usefull to LCAD users. Again, my building system is not specifying but (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
