 | | Re: A massive undertaking
|
|
david <raptor222_@excite.com> wrote in message news:GyuoBt.4sC@lugnet.com... (...) How about we take one of Karim Nasser's excellent designs and scale then up to minifig size? (URL) rough scale might be 1:6. (i.e. one stud on the little ship equals (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A massive undertaking
|
|
(...) potential of raytracing as an end-result to LEGO CAD. Of course, I refuse to use his work if we can't obtain his permission, though. This sounds like a great place to start. I think it would give us a general framework, as well as logical (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A massive undertaking
|
|
(...) I await your recommendation XO. : ) D. Sinn (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A massive undertaking
|
|
(...) Wow, you honor me with the rank. Thanks! After carefully inspecting flight decks from the capital ships section of Pallas Spaceworks, I think the practical scale of translation would be 12:1. I realize this would make the project, well, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A massive undertaking
|
|
Whoops! Three errors to report! I just checked the scale factor again, and we should build at 20:1 for the sake of support vehicles (That Chevron Bomber is REALLY big!) and at least 10:1 for the non-support vhicle ships, although I would prefer 20:1 (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A massive undertaking
|
|
I like 1:10 for the Intrepid it makes it big but keeps it small enough to stay with the spirit of Pallas' smaller ships. As for the .dat files give me your email and I'll send the whole bunch in a .zip file. Just so you know XO is not honory you (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
