Subject:
|
Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:44:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9890 times
|
| |
|
|
OK
You do something great, and all the world is looking at it, finding the finest
detail one could have made much better. That's the power of internet-exchange.
Don't take this personally. I only wanted to remind the great job they did at
LEGO's when they created the RCX for kids and youngsters... and now engineers
and other skilled people juge for 5 years - and still play around with the toy.
Isn't that incredible?
Best regards,
Claude
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) It really is. I do think somebody made a mistake specific to the rotation sensor, though. I haven't decided yet whether it's the firmware, the sensor, or just the overall mechanism. I can understand how it got past quality control - sometimes (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) Please don't take my post as a criticism of the original firmware, I merely wanted to point out alternatives. I agree, the 3ms sample rate is more than adequate for most applications. (...) Yes, the RCX is rugged in many respects, but I think (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
