To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolabOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / ROBOLAB / 249
248  |  250
Subject: 
Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab
Date: 
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:39:23 GMT
Viewed: 
9716 times
  
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
But, even at faster speeds, it would drop enough counts that using
the sensor to track the distance a robot travels would be a game of chance.

I tend to think that positionning errors are more a problem of slip/skid than a
problem of lost counts...

Philo

That may be another problem to be solved; haven't got there yet because simply
counting rotations has been unreliable.  I mean with a motor shaft connected to
a rotation sensor - no wheels, no robot!  Can't even count rotations correctly.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
 
---...--->snip (...) Welcome to LEGO Mindstorms robotics: do great things in real world with imperfect tools and objects. That's what makes it so interesting. It's always the Apollo 13 challenge: "Here guys, that's what they have on bord! Come on (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
 
(...) I tend to think that positionning errors are more a problem of slip/skid than a problem of lost counts... Philo (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)

24 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR