 | | Re: Standard extension suggestions
|
|
(...) >Let me describe how I program on the RCX and it (...) Actually, it's this first bit that I find intimidating...the forth part sounds fun. Jeff jeffrey.hazen@northmill.net (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Standard extension suggestions
|
|
(...) It is hard for me to tell. It is not hard for me but I am a programmer with many years under his belt. However forth seems idealy suited for someone getting started. It is a very interactive environment which encourages experimentation. Let me (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Standard extension suggestions
|
|
I think this would be a good idea, even if they never incorporated into the "official" kernel. Sort of a code repository similar to what has been proposed for NQC. That said, the thing that intimidates me is my lack of any experience with the (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Standard extension suggestions
|
|
I suggest that we collectively create a standard extension package that makes life a little simpler for beginners or maybe for developers in general. I have already started what I would use but it occured to me that this might be of general value. (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | POWER_OFF serial port interaction
|
|
The following word has unexpected behavior: : off ." off" CR CR POWER_OFF ." on" CR ; I see the output when it turns off. when I turn it on I see nothing on the serial port. It finally appears when I type anything at the terminal. The character I (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
