NQC ("Not Quite C") : 562


Robotics / RCX / NQC / 562	561 \| 563

Subject:	Re: Duplex Comms with RCX
Newsgroups:	lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.tele, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date:	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 02:01:57 GMT
Reply-To:	mattdm@SPAMCAKEmattdm.org
Viewed:	197 times

Kekoa Proudfoot <kekoa@pixel.Stanford.EDU> wrote: > Obviously new hardware (or a hardware hack) would be preferred, but short > of these, what other choices are there? I actually prefer the "junk" solution to a hardware hack. -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/ Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Duplex Comms with RCX
(...) It seems to me that, given the current hardware, the choices are: send junk or let the tower go dead. My thinking is that if you send junk and trample something, so be it; the tower would have gone dead anyways, forcing you to lose whatever it (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.tele, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

11 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Active threads in Robotics

	Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers 21 hours ago

Custom Search