 | | Re: NQC on Linux dilema...
|
|
(...) Ok, here it is: It just sits there, after sending about 5 lines of hex code to the RCX with that -v option. it will not send any more code after that, no matter how long you wait. I have not such thing as a PSerial_unix.cpp file does not (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC on Linux dilema...
|
|
(...) Does the program just hang, or does it eventually (several seconds later) give up and print an error message? Try 'verbose' mode and post the results: nqc -v -d test.nqc One possibility is that somehow the port is configured for hardware (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC on Linux dilema...
|
|
Hey, I have a little dilema when running nqc on RedHat 6.1 distribution of Linux on a Toshiba Satellite 2615DVD Laptop Computer. I have a 'winmodem' that workes on some port, and the IR transmitter on 'COM1' equivalent. It will not load the programs (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Modulo operator in NQC
|
|
(...) The limitation is more historical than anything else. Originally expressions were all evaluated at compile time, which is why I have a bunch of operators (%, >>, <<) that have no corresponding bytecodes in the firmware. Over the last few (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Modulo operator in NQC
|
|
I'm trying to use the modulo operator in NQC, but I get an error that it expects constants. I checked the docs and that indeed seems to be the case. While I'm sure there must be instances where one would use constants on both sides of the operator, (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
