| |
dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com (Dave Baum) wrote:
> If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things...
>
> 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive
> C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead?
> The idea here would be that the RCX bytcodes are seriously crippled, and
> rather then hacking our way up the chain, why not start with something
> that was designed for more power up front. Also with either solution
> you'd get ready-made tools with Interactive C or a Java compiler.
I am kind of new to this, but what is meant by direct command? How
would tasks downloaded in another slot be assessable to some other
task to start up?
---
DonC
donc@cccd.edu
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC wishlist
|
| (...) I'm not sure if the terminology from LEGO is "direct" or "immediate" commands, but either way the idea is that some of the bytecodes can be sent to the RCX and the RCX will execute them immediately. There's a lot of overlap between the direct (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
| If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things... 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead? The idea here would be that the RCX (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
