To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 332
331  |  333
Subject: 
RE: NQC wishlist
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 21:29:00 GMT
Viewed: 
145 times
  
If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things...

1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive
C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead?
The idea here would be that the RCX bytcodes are seriously crippled, and
rather then hacking our way up the chain, why not start with something
that was designed for more power up front.  Also with either solution
you'd get ready-made tools with Interactive C or a Java compiler.

This might be a good idea. The pbForth thing is working out well too.
Maybe a C to FORTH translator would be useful. In the other hand,
making a custom bytecode interpreter means having to write the
interpreter and support it on different platforms. Dave has done
such  a good job of isolating the comms into their own class that he
makes it look easy. It's not.

The cool thing about pbForth is that the *brick* does the compilation
for you. No platform dependencies at all!

2) If you want NQC to support the extensions, *please* talk to me before
starting work on them.  You'd basically be adding a new 'target' for NQC
and I'd want to make sure its as consistent as possible with the three
existing targets (RCX, CyberMaster, Scout).

Whatever happened to Scout programming? There was a flurry of excitement
a few weks ago, but then nothing. Is anyone actually programming their Scout?

Cheers,

Ralph Hempel - P.Eng

--------------------------------------------------------
Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
<http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbFORTH>
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to:      rhempel at bmts dot com
--------------------------------------------------------



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NQC wishlist
 
If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things... 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead? The idea here would be that the RCX (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR