 | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
|
(...) Presumably this doesn't sit on top of NQC though? (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
|
(...) And, you should also consider ROBOLAB, by Pitsco-Dacta. That icon-based program is greatly in the spirit of LEGO and I find it a lot of ...fun! Jerry (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
|
I started out using RCXcc and love it. Recently (last two weeks) I've been using Visual NQC and it too is good. In fact you can say it is RCXcc on "steroids". And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC. The only reason for this is (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
|
I picked up my RIS 1.5 at the weekend and have build my first robot using the construcapedia. I decided to start simple so have built the bot with tank tracks and 2 touch sensors triggered by the bumpers at the front. So I'm now ready to start (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Visual NQC 2001 final version
|
|
The site was blocked because of to many traffic till the end of april. You can access the site normaly now. (May 1st) Ronald Strijbosch (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
