Subject:
|
RE: New RcxCC revision posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:49:44 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<MARCO@SOPORCEL.PTspamcake>
|
Viewed:
|
2134 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi,
Ok, so, I got home, downloaded the .zip, installed it on my "LegoStation" (a
486 with RCX2 on COM2 and CyberMaster on COM3) over the last version.
I think this was the "3.2 May 16th" Version.
Started up, defined the window sizes and positions and saved the two .ini
files.
Altered my pBricks.bat to:
Start RcxCC.exe /COM=2 /RCX=3 /POS=RCX2.ini
Start RcxCC.exe /COM=3 /RCX=1 /POS=CyberMaster.ini
...and started it up.
The new features work well. I think it could try to use the comm settings
first, and only show the connection windows if it fails to connect.
I like the "new" editor. As you said, it's a bit anoying the CTRL-INS not
working as expected.
I did some quick tests with the some NQC programs (didn't have the time to
do a proper test, for now) and I noticed some problems:
1) When having a syntax error, like #endf instead of #endif, the RCXCC gives
an wrong error message, saying it can't find NQC (I did get a snapshot of
it, but forgot to send it here). In my test, the syntax error was in an
#include file (I don't remember if I did the same test with the current
program file). I'm using NQC 2.2
2) There are some situations where the program warns of an error about
SPIRIT (again, I did a snapshot but don't have it here right now) and it's
anoying because it repeats the message box many times, creating about 20
warning boxes in 5 seconds. The only way to get out of this situation, is by
keeping the ENTER key pressed.
3) There's still some hangups when calling NQC, but I think these are fewer
than before.
I know I'm not helping much, because I'm not giving specific data, correctly
describing the various situations that create these errors, but thought of
saying something about what happened to me last night.
I'll try to do some serious documented tests with the most recent version I
can get at the time, this weekend (if not sooner). I'll post them here.
Keep up the good (and incredibly fast!) work on RcxCC, John :)
Thxs,
mc.
PS: Easter Egg ? ARGH! Have to investigate that ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news-gateway@lugnet.com
> [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
> Of John Hansen
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 10:42 PM
> To: lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: New RcxCC revision posted
>
>
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Marco Correia writes:
> > These options seam perfect, thanks John.
> >
> > I'll test it, when I get back home and post my findings.
>
>
> Be sure to use the most recent version to test the startup options. I
> tested it the other day and it seemed slightly broken but the
> last round of
> fixes which I uploaded on Saturday may have fixed the
> problems. I'll be
> doing some more testing early this week myself.
>
> I've fixed a few other problems since Saturday and I uploaded
> a new version
> this evening.
>
> Fixed in this release:
>
> 1) Read Only files opened in the editor are now (with any
> luck) actually
> read only. The previous release would still allow you to do
> several sorts
> of edits that should not be allowed on a file that is
> supposedly read only.
>
> 2) The keystroke editor defect mentioned in my last post has
> been fixed. Be
> sure to click the Default button on the Options tab of the Preferences
> dialog to clear out the extra stuff I was writing to the
> registry for the
> keystrokes.
>
> 3) I had broken the Macros when I switched to the new editor
> control. I
> noticed that and fixed it in this release.
>
> 4) I lightly modified a few of the other dialogs to better support the
> Scout. The watch window correctly hides variables greater
> than number 9 and
> timer number 3 among other revisions. The Memory Map window
> will currently
> display "not yet implemented for Scout" if displayed when the
> RCX type is Scout.
>
> 5) I modified the program to auto-create fewer forms on
> startup which may
> make it start a little bit faster and use a little less
> memory and system
> resources.
>
> Has anyone seen the Easter Egg Marc Overmars put in the About box?
>
> LMKWYT,
> John Hansen
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
| (...) Be sure to use the most recent version to test the startup options. I tested it the other day and it seemed slightly broken but the last round of fixes which I uploaded on Saturday may have fixed the problems. I'll be doing some more testing (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
