|
|
 | | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| Ah :) That would be great ! It's very usefull for "debuging" Thxs, :) mc. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| John, Yes please mail me your source code so I can add scout support to my program. In the beta version I added syntax highlighting the same way as in RCXCC only programmed in VB. The final version uses a complete new editor with support everything (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Yeah, that went away as soon as I started using the RCX 2.0 locals for variable allocation - the symbolic information just didn't survive the rework. And I completely forgot to put it back in. I'm working on enhancing the listing a bit. I'll (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC, Join Forces !
|
| (...) That's a very good idea, JOIN FORCES (1+1>2) , divide the work and release your source codes, and make RCXcc alomost as popular as LINUX. Maybe sometimes in the future, when I've more time available, I'll join you. (...) Stef Mientki (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Adding Scout support, if you are relying on Spirit.ocx, is essentially the same as providing Cybermaster support. It was very simple for me to add Scout support to RcxCC. I'll email you my revised RcxCC source code if you'd like. I am not a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
