 | | Re: lcd display on RCX 1.0
|
|
(...) If you load RCX2 firmware in a RCX1 brick (they are fully compatible*), you'll have acces to this function (and all other RCX2 specific possibilities) Philo *Except for some minor differences in IR hardware. (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | lcd display on RCX 1.0
|
|
NQC: with RCX2, it has a function to display a user defined value. Is there a way to do it with RCX 1.0? How about just to display the current mail value with RCX1.0? Suggestion? Thanks in advance. --Elizabeth (17 years ago, 24-Jun-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC release 3.1r6 - support for 64-bit platforms
|
|
I have posted a new release of NQC which includes the fixes from r5 which were never officially released (aside from being included along with recent versions of BricxCC). It also includes a small source code change which makes it possible to (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: IR tower problems on a laptop with NQC
|
|
(...) Jordan, I only have one suggestion that may, or may not be useful. I'd suggest you try a fresh battery in the tower. I know you said it works on another PC. Sorry, that's the best I can do. :) Steve (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | IR tower problems on a laptop with NQC
|
|
I have a used Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop that is old enough to have a serial port. I'm trying to use a serial port IR tower to program an RCX and am having problems. When I plug in the tower the green light turns on immediately, which AFAIK is not (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: nqc compilation errors
|
|
(...) thank you. specific sulution: 'nqc -Trcx2 error.nqc' instead of 'nqc error.nqc' (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: nqc compilation errors
|
|
(...) Gus is correct, although there are other targets which support arrays and indirect variables. NQC defaults to RCX as the target. You need to use the -TRCX2 switch if you are running the 2.0 firmware on your RCX and you want to use arrays and (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: nqc compilation errors
|
|
(...) Only the RCX2 firmware supports these features. If you set the target to RCX2 then it will compile. Gus (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | nqc compilation errors
|
|
Background: (...) nqc version 3.1 r4 (built Jan 12 2007, 19:11:18) Copyright (C) 2005 John Hansen. All Rights Reserved. Usage error: try 'nqc -help' to display options (...) Linux eip 2.6.17-10-386 #2 Fri Oct 13 18:41:40 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | MacNQC on Intel anyone?
|
|
Hi, after replacing my PowerMac and iBook with a new Intel based iMac and MacBook respectively, I yesterday hit the small but noticeably issue to get MacNQC to run on it. While the Rosetta environment seems to run MacNQC reasonably fine, it may be (...) (18 years ago, 27-Nov-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Watching Arrays
|
|
(...) Thanks John! I never knew about that F12 thing :) -Rob A> (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Watching Arrays
|
|
(...) The way to do this is to find out the variable number assigned by NQC to your array variable and then watch that variable number plus all the ones up through the size of your array. You can find out the variable number by viewing the code (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Watching Arrays
|
|
I have a program (RCX2 target) that uses a couple of global arrays. I am using BricxCC 3.3 How can I view the contents of the array at run time? "Watch the Brick" shows me Var0 to Var 31 but these don't seem to relate/contain the values I initially (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: swan firmware motor problem
|
|
(...) I have tried it, but it did not make a difference. The motors still won't run. I must admit that I did not think of it before because I thought (maybe wrongly) that the old API would stay the same and that you would have to use the new (...) (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: swan firmware motor problem
|
|
I will post latest firmware on web site soon. -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of Gustavo Brinck Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:27 PM To: lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com (...) (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: swan firmware motor problem
|
|
(...) I don't have the new firmware, but maybe you can try: #define NORMAL_SPEED 100 because, now the firmware have 100 step of motor pwr control. Best Regards Gustavo (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | swan firmware motor problem
|
|
Hi, I trying out the Swan firmware (Fast0103.lgo) with nqc 3.1 r4 but for some reason the motors won't turn on. Has anybody seen something like that? If I run the program, it does all the other things, even switch on the little motor triangles on (...) (18 years ago, 9-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX remote jammer
|
|
(...) Sorry peoples - the program is working again. Try it out on your unsuspecting friends - watch the channel YOU want to. :) As far as I know, I'm the only one to have figured out how to do this with the RCX, and it's a pretty good joke. Prgm (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Join the Hoodia revolution
|
|
Hoodia 920+ -- The newest and most exciting fat loss product available - As seen on Oprah! (URL) testimonials: "I was originally amazed that the first two pills I took of Hoodia 920+, almost immediately took my cravings away. Now 4 weeks later, 3 (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
(...) You're welcome - it's a fun problem. At least partially because it's one of the few times I've had to worry about the speed of bytecode execution under the standard firmware (see below). (...) Given what you are transmitting and how you are (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
