 | | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Thanks for the info on the electric datalink. It's a clever idea that I never would have thought of myself. It seems to me that you could cut down on your transmission time if you changed the shape of your pulse train. The pauses between bits don't (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
I am not positive about this, but some of the jitter may be due to the mode in which the motor outputs work. They are PWM at 125 Hz, so I am wondering if, when the byte code to change an output setting is executed, the new state setting is placed (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Bernd, When you need it really fast, you sholud use legOS instead of NQC. A program written with NQC uses the LEGO firmware, which is a ByteCode Interpreter. This pogram is interpreted Byte after Byte from firmaware. The firmware executes the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending variables betwen rcx's?
|
|
Hi Adam, if I understand your problem correctly, you want to transmit a sensor value from one RCX to another RCX which will work with that value. Now, if the 2 RCXs can "see" each other than simply use the Message statement. If not, you should take (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
It's me again with the subject "electrical datalink between 2 RCXs" (I posted some articles a couple of weeks ago). This subject may seem trivial but in fact it is not. Dealing with it, I discovered some "unpleasanties" in the general execution of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
