Subject:
|
Re: (fwd) Re: patch for lnpd ( Collision problem in far-mode )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:53:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1378 times
|
| |
| |
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Markus L. Noga wrote:
> > I actually just took care of it- legOS.sourceforge.net is now ours, and
> > should be propagating towards your DNS servers as we speak. It'll be a
> > few hours (their setup time) and probably Wednesday (my time- "Mathematical
> > Foundations of Computer Science" exam) before I start moving things from
> > arthurdent to there.
>
> That's great. The sourceforge server seems to have fairly decent
> bandwidth, judging from the speed legOS.sourceforge.net is coming up in
> my second window.
There is a discussion that somewhere in their site about their HW setup.
Suffice to say that it is multiple terabytes in HD size, 40+ processors,
yadda, yadda. Reliability and bandwidth are not an issue, I don't think.
> > 4) public CVS for LNP and the core of legOS (considering the number of
> > patches I've been seeing flying around here) would also be nice.
> > Write access, would, of course, be limited to the primary authors, but
> > it'd be nice to generate "real" patches that would be much easier to apply.
>
> CVS is what attracted me in the first place. As repositories are
> completely mobile, I'll probably be able to simply upload mine. What's
> the procedure? I already registered with sourceforge five minutes ago.
I have too give you write access. Let me know your sourceforge login, and
I'll start taking care of it.
> Fixes and enhancements will propagate vastly faster with CVS - right
> now, I'm reluctant to make a new release simply because somebody found
> out the VERSION file is still showing the old number ;-)
>
> > 5) a legOS-announce mailing list would be nice (for people who want
> > important news without the sometimes arcane lugnet traffic.)
>
> I think LUGnet is important - most anybody who's doing LEGO on the
> internet is bound to stumble into it sooner or later. We shouldn't give
> up our presence there needlessly. Besides, LUGnet already offers a lot
> more than a simple mailing list.
Sure- I meant this (perhaps- I may be wrong) as a very minimal list- no
discussion, announcements about versions or important patches only.
> The discussion boards on noga.de have already fragmented the discussion
> about legOS somewhat. Is this a trend we wish to pursue? Originally, I
> thought the file upload features would help to turn the legOS site into
> a platform for lnpd and related projects, too, but that's not quite how
> it worked out.
I don't think we want to fragment it any more, that's for sure. I just
thought one very focused list with very minimal traffic would be a good idea.
> > If Markus wants, we can also move the primary site to
> > legOS.sourceforge.net, including the forums and such. Or not- completely
> > up to the man.
>
> The entire IPO business has left me highly sceptical about Linux
> companies, especially the multi-billion dollar variety. So I dislike the
> creepy little banners for VA Linux Systems. Internet companies spend
> over 60% of their money on branding, i.e., advertisement. Why on earth
> should we give it to any of them for free?
Fair enough.
> If we can obtain zero-advertisement webspace at sourceforge, and if
> somebody would like to occupy him/herself with the web pages a little,
> I'd be willing to move quickly.
As I understand it (and I can check fairly easily) only the very front
page needs an advertisement- the rest of the pages are advertisement
free. I may be wrong, though.
> If I stay the only one maintaining the web pages, nothing changes for
> me, so a move would be very low priority.
Fair :)
> If there's no way to get rid of advertising, I'd rather pay for my
> bandwidth at noga.de. At least, legOS didn't break my monthly limit yet.
Sure. Up to you :)
-Luis
#######################################################################
Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
-Anonymous
#######################################################################
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|