Subject:
|
Re: HELP - LegOS for Windows
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 21:12:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2428 times
|
| |
|
|
alex wetmore wrote:
> Why are you using the 16-bit (DOS) DJGPP tools under Windows NT instead of
> the Cygwin 32-bit stuff? You won't run into any of these command line
> length headaches when using the 32-bit shell and tools.
The DJGPP tools are 32-bit. It's a limitation of the DOS shell (COMMAND.COM &
CMD.EXE) that is the problem.
Cygwin doesn't have a command line limit problem, but it has its own unique
headaches. Read the number of posts of people trying to get the Cygwin system
working for legOS development to get an idea of what a pain it can be for
non-Unix people.
Rossz
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: HELP - LegOS for Windows
|
| "Rossz Vámos-Wentworth" <rossw@jps.net> wrote in message news:38989DC8.62ED27...jps.net... (...) of (...) (COMMAND.COM & (...) The problems that you are mentioning generally only occur after running 16-bit programs (and thus ending up with a 16-bit (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: HELP - LegOS for Windows
|
| "Rossz Vámos-Wentworth" <rossw@jps.net> wrote in message news:FpACn3.FLt@lugnet.com... (...) gets (...) aren't (...) remove (...) make (...) Why are you using the 16-bit (DOS) DJGPP tools under Windows NT instead of the Cygwin 32-bit stuff? You (...) (25 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
