Subject:
|
Re: 1.0,1.5 or 2.0 ? what gives ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:58:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1609 times
|
| |
|
|
Using a multiplexor from http://www.techno-stuff.com/ you can hook four touch
sensors up to one port. The multiplexor http://www.techno-stuff.com/swmux.htm
allows you to determine if any of three sensors is pressed, when you hook up a
forth it masks the other three and but if you assume that only one side at a
time is being pressed then this is ok. Of course if since it only takes one
sensor port you could just hook the forth up to one of the other two ports.
If you buy this, I've written some code for LegOS to make the decoding easier,
I'd be happy to send you a copy.
I think the biggest difference for 2.0 is that it has a USB IR tower. This is
espically important to LegOS users. I have a friend who got the USB tower to
work with LegOS under windows, but I think people are having trouble with
Linux. The 2.0 RCX should work fine with Linux and LegOS, you'd just need a
serial tower, or USB hacking skills :)
mark
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Kenneth Johansen writes:
> hi, is this list still working ?
> last time i tried to post i got an error 0 ? whatever that means.
>
> anyways. if it works, then i have the following question!
> what does RCX 2.0 bring us that 1.0 and 1.5 doesnt already have ?
> i have looked at the www.legomindstorm.com site, but all i could
> figgure out there was that some of the additional software and lego
> bricks had been changed. anyone know the the RCX itself has been changed from
> the 1.5 version ?
>
> regards
> kenneth johansen
>
> ps: anyone know if its possible to have 4 sensors on an RCX?
> im trying to build a robot with 1 push-sensor on each side.
> i seem to recall reading somewhere that it could be done, but
> i cant for the life of me figgure out where i read that.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | 1.0,1.5 or 2.0 ? what gives ?
|
| hi, is this list still working ? last time i tried to post i got an error 0 ? whatever that means. anyways. if it works, then i have the following question! what does RCX 2.0 bring us that 1.0 and 1.5 doesnt already have ? i have looked at the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
