Subject:
|
Re: 1.0,1.5 or 2.0 ? what gives ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:17:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1422 times
|
| |
|
|
kenneth johansen <kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no> writes:
>
> anyone know the the RCX itself has been changed from the 1.5 version ?
To put it bluntly, the only user visible is in the numbers on the outside.
> ps: anyone know if its possible to have 4 sensors on an RCX?
> im trying to build a robot with 1 push-sensor on each side.
> i seem to recall reading somewhere that it could be done, but
> i cant for the life of me figgure out where i read that.
Put more than one on an input and figure out which one was pressed
by the direction you were heading.
If they can be pressed simultaneously you need resistors to distinguish
them.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen Stuber <stuber@loria.fr>
http://www.loria.fr/~stuber/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 1.0,1.5 or 2.0 ? what gives ?
|
| (...) Instead of using resistors, you can use RAW mode which measures how far in the sensor was pushed. Then use a bit of tape to prevent one of the sensors from being pushed in all the way. BTW, I am lucky enough to have a defective touch sensor (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 1.0,1.5 or 2.0 ? what gives ?
|
| hi, is this list still working ? last time i tried to post i got an error 0 ? whatever that means. anyways. if it works, then i have the following question! what does RCX 2.0 bring us that 1.0 and 1.5 doesnt already have ? i have looked at the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
