Subject:
|
Re: lnp rcx hostaddress
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:29:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1608 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Vittorio Zamparella writes:
> I have an important question:
>
> WHY the rcx lnp address (and mask) is hardcoded in the library?
>
> I inspected the source code for both the pc part and the rcx part.
> The pc library is well formed and the init function allows you to set up the
> address and mask.
> Instead the rcx lnp library (lnp.c) lacks of a real init function and the
> internals rely on configuration symbols rather than variables. It is really
> not clear the purpose of this choice.
>
> The work needed to straighten the library is minimal: two more variables, an
> init function (based on the pc-side library) and the change of to lines in
> the logical-received function.
> And I'm gonna do it because our project specifically needs to use multiple
> rcx toghether.
>
> Comments on this topics will be appreciated.
>
> Ciao,
> Vittorio
Hi,
could you please post the code ?
Thanks
Cu,
Olaf
"Dammit Jim, I'm a programmer not a brain surgeon!"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | lnp rcx hostaddress
|
| I have an important question: WHY the rcx lnp address (and mask) is hardcoded in the library? I inspected the source code for both the pc part and the rcx part. The pc library is well formed and the init function allows you to set up the address and (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
