Subject:
|
Re: lnp rcx hostaddress [and a summer legOS release?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Sun, 27 May 2001 15:39:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1404 times
|
| |
|
|
Vittorio-
I've frequently wondered the same, but since I've never had reason to
use LNP I've never fixed it. If you'd like to submit a patch I'll gladly
apply it to the source tree.
In other news- I'm back, more or less. While this week will be pretty
hectic, I'll be spending parts of the next two weeks slowly going
through the legOS archives of the past 6 months and getting back on my
feet. I know lots of people have expressed interest in all variety of
contributions, including stuff related to a new networking protocol and
new and better documentation, and I'd like to get these people involved
as I get myself back into the swing of things.
I'd like to aim at a new release by the end of the summer (say, late
August.) I have no idea at the moment what would go into such a
release... I'll work on a list as I read through the archives, but I'd
think it would probably include new documentation, an API
cleanup/reorganization, and hopefully lots of LNP re-working to make it
more usable. If anyone else has suggestions- please! fire away. My legOS
needs are met; so I'm not exactly going to be a fount of ideas- I just
want to be a clearinghouse and organizer and perhaps coder for the work
and ideas of others.
Anyway, let me know if you think I'm nuts...
Luis
On 27 May 2001 11:16:02 +0000, Vittorio Zamparella wrote:
> I have an important question:
>
> WHY the rcx lnp address (and mask) is hardcoded in the library?
>
> I inspected the source code for both the pc part and the rcx part.
> The pc library is well formed and the init function allows you to set up the
> address and mask.
> Instead the rcx lnp library (lnp.c) lacks of a real init function and the
> internals rely on configuration symbols rather than variables. It is really
> not clear the purpose of this choice.
>
> The work needed to straighten the library is minimal: two more variables, an
> init function (based on the pc-side library) and the change of to lines in
> the logical-received function.
> And I'm gonna do it because our project specifically needs to use multiple
> rcx toghether.
>
> Comments on this topics will be appreciated.
>
> Ciao,
> Vittorio
--
Luis Villa
Duke University '01
http://tieguy.org/
"Liberace outlived Elvis, thereby suggesting to many there is no God, or if
there is one, He lacks taste."
-www.lileks.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | lnp rcx hostaddress
|
| I have an important question: WHY the rcx lnp address (and mask) is hardcoded in the library? I inspected the source code for both the pc part and the rcx part. The pc library is well formed and the init function allows you to set up the address and (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
