Subject:
|
Re: text location for apps and q?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:04:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1268 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Michael J Ash wrote:
> Fork might be interesting, but it seems like starting another thread would
> be simpler and take less memory.
You can't implement a true fork() anyway, since you don't have memory
management and therefore can't copy the address space of the parent process.
John A. Tamplin LiveOnTheNet.COM, Inc.
jat@LiveOnTheNet.COM 2104 West Ferry Way
256/705-7007 - FAX 256/705-7100 Huntsville, AL 35801
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: text location for apps and q?
|
| (...) I just have to ask why you're doing this, just for the heck of it? I mean, the output device you're writing two can hold a whopping five characters at a time. I don't really see the benefit of changing to a more complicated interface. Of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
