|
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| (...) I saw it. Don't know if others did. I thought I replied? (...) one liners :) (...) That would be nice if true :) (...) It will definitely need some more HOWTO updates. That's quite OK, especially if it means we can "standardize" all the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| Which version of egcs? And what are the errors? Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are jumping and the cotton is high... So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry." -Ella ---...--- (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| Okay. Binutils compiled and installed fine, but when I try to compile egcs, I get many errors, unrelated to any libraries. When I run the failed commands manually (without make), they compile fine. Then I got an error about not having enough virtual (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| (...) made (...) Andy (and others), Note that you can now use gcc 2.95.2 to compile legOS - I posted about this yesterday, but it seems to have got lost in the LugNet hiccup. The problem is not with the compiler, but with the options in the in-line (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| Shouldn't. That's what my current set of tools was compiled with. When I referred (elsewhere?) to "changes with 2.95," I meant only that 2.95 has a different configuration syntax. Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |