Subject:
|
Re: Has anyone used lnpd succesfully?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 May 2000 21:03:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1612 times
|
| |
|
|
Toni Martinez-Colom wrote:
>
> I worked all this a couple of months ago and now I have almost no time to
> play with it so I don't know if Martin Cornelius (we were in contact to try
> to fix this) have been working on it... (Ping!! Martin?? Still Alive? ;-)
Of course, but also currently not very available. But i still would like
to fix this problem, or at least find the reason. Sporadically, i'm
working or better say thinking about an enhanced version of lnpd, but i
think this doesn't make much sense if we can't get basic things to work
for everybody.
The problem is, that i cannot reproduce those reported failures, neither
on my pentiumIII box nor on the old 486 digged out in the cellar. Steve,
if you would like to work with me on that issue, please drop me a note.
I promise to look into my private mailbox every evening !
--
Martin Cornelius
Martin.Cornelius@t-online.de
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Has anyone used lnpd succesfully?
|
| Yes. I have used it successfully, though not always... In my case it seems to be a problem with the uart 16550A. It does not switch to low lattency mode correctly making the tower blind to the RCX. I circumvented the problem setting the UART type as (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
