 | | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
Yahoo! Maybe we adult lego enthusiasts can finally come out of the closet & say, "were here, we like lego's, GET USED TO IT!!!" : ) Michael Aaron (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) That's kind of only a tiny mention. I meant that it didn't really talk about it in-depth. That's what's so cool about the new article, IMHO -- it's a first step toward a larger awareness. --Todd (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
It does talk about the " using an open architecture system. " "MindStorms robot developers were creating code in a variety of languages like Visual Basic and C on their PCs and uploading the code to the RCX units. " John A. Donaldson (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) (I guess I should have posted, instead of going to lunch! ;-) But there *IS* a URL...they just didn't put http:// in front of it, so your browser may have missed it. They mentioned Markus' site ((URL) in that same paragraph. (They mention (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) This is BIG NEWS and GREAT exposure for Markus and friends!!! -- a major business magazine recognizing the pursuits and achievements of adult LEGO fanatics on the net to extend the RCX technology toward greater heights! In May, Forbes also had (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I remember that! But aren't you supposed to do it mod 255 for maximum effectiveness? Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
Hi, I'm kinda new to LUGNET, so if I get this wrong - sorry! I'm interested in this LNP idea that seemed to be floating around a few months ago. Is it still alive, and if so what state has it got to? I would be grateful if someone can post or e-mail (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
Check it out here- brief, and unfortunately no URLs, but... (URL) (who is only slightly hurt that his documentation wasn't mentioned :) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | better test value for touch sensors
|
|
FYI: The simple-rover example uses an unsafe test value for touch sensors. Touch sensor should be tested against <0xf000, NOT <0x2000 (e.g. simple-rover.c) Reason: Not pressed has a constant value >0xf000. Pressed varies depending on battery change, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | The IR FIX -- was: Re: Is IR considered broken?
|
|
(...) I had the same problem. (...) Here's the fix: enclode the old handler code in #ifdef TRASH, use the new #else part. I'll say a few things about the motivation below. (If you prefer to patch, download (URL) it's based on LegOS 0.1.7 but should (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensors?
|
|
Thanks Mark, those changes got rotation-sensor.c working for me. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: emulegOS: a new release
|
|
Just a note about a small bug. The supplied sample program ir-rover.cpp doesn't work on the real RCX. I think this may be due to IR complications under legOs. I'm working on a version which will work on both the emulator and the real system and will (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | emulegOS: a new release
|
|
Mark Falco improved his Tcl/Tk version of emulegOS with tons of cool features. This version is now considered the "official" version of emulegOS, and we hope to release a Tcl based Windows version soon. The new features include: - IR support: (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensors?
|
|
(...) [snip...] If you want to have more info about the sotry of this problem search this newsgruop for "rotation sensor bug found". Mario (URL) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensors?
|
|
Yep, others have reported having these problems. Here's a fix I came up with, but has also only been tested on my system. There have been reports that the existing code works for some, and not for others, so you may need to customize this. just (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Rotation sensors?
|
|
Hello, Rotation sensors appear to be broken in the 990330 snapshot. Here's part of the code I'm using: ds_active(&SENSOR_3); ds_rotation_on(&SENSOR_3); ds_rotation_set(&SENSOR_3, 0); while (!PRESSED(button_state(), BUTTON_VIEW)) { (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Barcode Reader on LegOS page
|
|
Here is alex's webpage taken from the Legos page: (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Barcode Reader on LegOS page
|
|
What is Alex's page? (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: is IR considered broken?
|
|
(...) For all who are interested, I copied the source to: (URL) porting hints, e-mail me directly. -Kekoa (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: is IR considered broken?
|
|
Yes I would be interested in seeing the libRcx implementation of the IR functions. thanks, Mark (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
