 | | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
I used binutils-2.12 and gcc-2.95.3 and Max Bowsher's build-h8x script. I got what I thought was a successful "ALL DONE" message, but I still can not make new .lx files for the RCX. Are there additional directories I need to add to my path...or (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
Well, after a fairly frustrating couple of days, I was finally able to build legOS-0.2.5 yesterday evening. I will get to the details in a minute. The whole experience made me question the stability of Cygwin/GCC. Basically, I tried at least 3 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) No it doesn't! Cygwin stores some info in the registry. Besides, why would you want multiple cygwin versions? Max. (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
(...) Ooops. Forgot to remove that before I sent it to you. Delete that line. (...) Well, I wrote the script, so I guess it makes sense to me. (...) True... BUT: You are using the cygwin versions of binutils and gcc. I don't know why, and don't have (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) My recent patch should fix this. If you have the time and inclination, please test it. Max. Patch included again for convenience's sake: ### BEGIN PATCH ### diff -mru cvs-legOS/Makefile.common work-legOS/Makefile.common --- (...) (23 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
