| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
Well, after a fairly frustrating couple of days, I was finally able to build legOS-0.2.5 yesterday evening. I will get to the details in a minute. The whole experience made me question the stability of Cygwin/GCC. Basically, I tried at least 3 (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) No it doesn't! Cygwin stores some info in the registry. Besides, why would you want multiple cygwin versions? Max. (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
(...) Ooops. Forgot to remove that before I sent it to you. Delete that line. (...) Well, I wrote the script, so I guess it makes sense to me. (...) True... BUT: You are using the cygwin versions of binutils and gcc. I don't know why, and don't have (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) My recent patch should fix this. If you have the time and inclination, please test it. Max. Patch included again for convenience's sake: ### BEGIN PATCH ### diff -mru cvs-legOS/Makefile.common work-legOS/Makefile.common --- (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
My test results as first time cygwin/legos user on Windows sytem. Environment: Windows XP Version 5.1.2600 Serial IR tower on COM2: Following INSTALL-cygwin.html: Cygwin installed from www.cygwin.com using setup.exe and internet install as shown in (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|