 | | thread class for legOS
|
|
I write a Thread class for LegOs with a simple interface like in Java or CommonC++. I'm using LegOs 0.2.4. Below are my work till yet. The problem is in the Method Start(). The line is marked with !!. The error message is at the end of the file. I (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Routing daemon with tcp/ip for RCX/legOS, Cybermaster/NQC
|
|
"Freddy" <mail-nowak@web.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:GpzyB6.Kpt@lugnet.com... (...) A C++ class to build client application without knowing the LNPoI protocol is available for Windows and Linux now. (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
(...) I would strongly suggest changing this to while(1) msleep(bignumber);. Otherwise you're hogging the processor doing nothing important, which could do bad things to any compute-intensive tasks you may have going. It'll also use slightly less (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
Hi Ross (...) you (...) What are the advantages and disadvantages of this method as opposed to the one I used? mike (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
(...) Note also since bumper_task() is an infinite loop, and you never use pid1, you could save one thread by doing this: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { pid2 = execi (&left_task, 0, NULL, PRIO_NORMAL+2, DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE); pid3 = execi (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
;-) That worked a treat, thanks Michael. (thanks for the other little corrections in the code too). mike (...) Mike, (...) your subroutines and then you leave main()! Leaving main means (...) memory is freed. The following will do the job: (...) (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
Hi Mike, your problem is not because of an error in legOS. But what you do is that you start your subroutines and then you leave main()! Leaving main means that all your allocated memory is freed. The following will do the job: ---...--- cut here (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | IRC
|
|
Anyone who is a regular user of IRC can join my channel #LegoMindstorms (on dalnet). Coma and chat or give/recieve assistance. If you join you are welcome to Ops because anyone in here will know more about Mindstorms than me as i know almost (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads
|
|
Albert (...) yea, I see what you are getting at. I am sure that I was hitting the bumper while the threads were still alive, but I will check again. I think this also points out some of the dangers of just dumping in some poorly thought out dummy (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
(...) As pointed by Albert Huang, you cannot call kill() with an "invalid" pid. Actually, the comment above kill() in tm.c says: //! kill a process /*! \param pid must be valid process ID, or undefined behaviour will result! The function updates (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
