 | | Re: about lnp_integrety_write
|
|
(...) Hi, the function does exactly what the name says...it sends a LNP integrity layer packet of given length. Anyway the function seems to be unused. lnp_addressing_write() is e.g. used to send the acknowledges in program.c, which makes perfect (...) (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | about lnp_integrety_write
|
|
anyone know what this function does? i could get no reference to it under the legOS howto written by luis villa. ive tried sending messages both with it and without it and it seems to work anyways. regards kenneth johansen kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
(...) Hmmm, yes, you are right. In fact it woudn't make sense. My actual robot uses a little neural net and if battery goes low, the actual data will be sent to the PC to be saved. For this, it would be nice if the RCX makes some noise, I grab it, (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
(...) ultra-low (...) Would that really make sense? Since changing batteries destroys all memory, the program will not survive despite advance warning about the impending doom of battery low. In effect, changing the batteries is equivalent to the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
So in the original firmware, the system is shut down if ultra-low battery is detected. If we don't want tot do that, we could change the ">" in the 2nd compare to a "<" to get some hysteresis. Or would it be usefull to stop legOS and do a shut-down (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
(...) in (...) Statement should be right. It's same behavier found in original firmware: (URL) (battery power (cc5a) > 1a2c (6700 mV)) call ROM 1e4a (r6=301b) // clear battery low indicator else if (battery power (cc5a) > 189c (6300 mV)) call ROM (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lnp logical layer and collison detection
|
|
Hi, 1: does anybody know if the collision detection in the (LNP) logical layer relies on the LNP-packtstructure of is this kind of collison detection done without knowing the packetstructure of LNP ? 2: does anybody have simple routines to send and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Makefile Design - Observation, and Query to Paolo Masetti
|
|
The latest CVS version of legOS adds explicit detection of CygWin 1.1 (and by extension 1.3) This did, however work anyway, with Cygwin 1.1 being detected alongside the older cygwins, due to a quirk in make's findstring - specifically, that: (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | re: remote control
|
|
(...) I dont know if this is what you are looking for, but it appears to do the same thing over the web. I havent taken much of a look at it. (URL) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | remote control
|
|
hi all, ive been out of the loop for a while now (summer vacation). so if this has been discused lately forgive my ignorance. im working on a program that lets me control the RCX from a PC using the IR tower. im using legOS 2.4 on redhat 6.1. i am (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
