 | | Rotation sensor bug found (maybe!)
|
|
I think I might have found a bug in the ds_rotation_handler (direct-sensor.c). The problem arises when the STATE_0_VALUE is checked using the IN_RANGE macro. As STATE_0_VALUE is 1023U<<6, which is about the max value for an unsigned, adding to it (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) Actually, no. On attempt 16, you reserve some more bits further down for the new version number :-) Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I'd prefer 11111b for broadcast, in keeping with TCP/IP. Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
I personally can't see needing more than about 7 tasks listening at one time anyway. Keep in mind that the resources on the lego are very very small. As far as reserving an address for IPC that would be fine. We could reserve 00000b for IPC and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I can see this. but it is starting to feel a little cramped on the ports, though. What functionality is port 0 reserved for? Actually, I was thinking of reserving a host address (such as 0x0) for IPC. I'd probably want to have more than 3 (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Rotation sensor help (some progress)
|
|
Again about my problems with legOS and the rotation sensor. First of all I checked the four values returned by both my two rotation sensor. They are different from the ones inside direct-sensor.c but anyway inside the specified range legOS: (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
I figured that out... Thanks... I am subscribed via email now! Much nicer... I am just too lazy to remeber to go check news groups. -Jake (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
Jacob S. Barrett <jsbarrett@acm.org> wrote in message news:3716681C.D5C8C6...acm.org... (...) You can subscribe to this newsgroup as a mailing list. I would prefer to see it on this group (or less thing to subscribe to) or to have lugnet make a new (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP Repost
|
|
I thought it might be good to repost this with some changes... Okay a little smaller... Only a 4 byte header... |0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|0|1...3|4|5|6|7| ---...--- | 0xF | VER | TOADDR | PORT| FRADDR | PORT| PAYLOADLEN | ---...--- / PAYLOAD / ---...--- / (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
(...) I am not in position right now, time-wise, to contribute to the LNP, but I am very interested, and may have time to contribute soon. In the mean time, I'd like to keep up with the project. I don't know if you realize, Jacob, but if you prefer (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
