 | | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
|
(...) Ahhh, this is a hint why it shows up now. The additional delay in the dsensor code shifts the duty cycle of the sensor down just a little bit, so it can't operate anymore. This will all be fixed with the new code in 0.2.5. I will get myself (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: solaris + legOS
|
|
(...) Oh yes. I can commit patches in CVS for you. :-) (...) Enjoy!!!! :-) Bye, Paolo. --- Ignorance is temporary; Stupidity lasts forever!!! (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: utils/Makefile.common problem - djgpp
|
|
(...) I think that in we intented to write: # DJGPP does not define OSTYPE # ifndef OSTYPE OSTYPE=MSDOS endif Because we know that DJPP does not define OSTYPE. Are we sure that uname.exe is always present in a DJPP installation? (...) No problem. (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
|
(...) This is a quite interesting situation to test. When I released patched sensors routines, I've tested the sensor values (expecially rotation one) with batteries full and with very exausted batteries, but never with exausted batteries and motors (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
|
(...) Powering them more frequently but for a shorter time, you mean? Yes- I do see your point. This will be something to keep track of when/if we mess with the sensors in 0.2.x. BTW, in hindsight, this should have been obvious- the reason that the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
