To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / *109 (-10)
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
(...) The helpful folks on the crossgcc mailing list told me that this error indicates that no libstdc was found, so no binary could be generated for the target (not host) platform. Since legOS provides a replacement library, there is no problem (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
This site is quite useful: (URL) found it via ftp.cygnus.com/pub/crossgcc. I hope it helps you out. Cheers, Vic (...) LANGUAGES="c (...) that (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
I got everything to build using egcs 1.1.2, but I am having problems with the tm-and-ir demo (after modifying it for the new execi syntax) which make me think maybe egcs is not generating correct code. I used the build instructions at (URL) did use (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
(...) I did not have this problem. Sounds like Fortran. Did you 'make LANGUAGES="c c++"' or just 'make'? The latter makes the Fortran stuff, too. Remember that if you specify LANGUAGES when building, you should specify the same value when (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
(...) I got the same message, and your reasoning about the content of the message sounds AOK by me. But then I did a make install, and that crudded out on me, with the message In file included from ../../../egcs-1.1.2/...com.c:198: (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
I have. I got the same message. I assume it is part of the test suite. I just bit the bullet and did a "make install" anyway, and it works fine. I take it as saying that it cannot generate an executable for the host platform, which would be true, (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: gcc build instructions for linux
 
(...) Has anyone successfully built the above target using egcs-1.1.2? My attempt failed in libiberty: ... configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. make: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: cputs / argc,argv / snapshot
 
Oops. Did I say David? That's what you get for speaking on the phone and typing simultaneously. I meant Dan, of cause! (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  cputs / argc,argv / snapshot
 
Hi, I implemented a cleaner cputs(). Should work with all compilers, also 20% smaller. I went ahead and implemented argc/argv parameter passing for execi as well. This prompted a bugfix for memcpy, which I did create. As I was at it, I also merged (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: cputw
 
(...) By "doesn't work", I assume the patch applied successfully and your compiler barfed with some sort of error message or generated incorrect code. That would tend to (at least slightly) indicate that the problem that I was trying to fix may have (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR