To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / 651
650  |  652
Subject: 
RE: Expanding the available input/output ports of the RCX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx
Date: 
Sun, 9 Jul 2000 23:52:35 GMT
Reply-To: 
<rmeenaks@olf+nomorespam+.com>
Viewed: 
798 times
  
Sure you can try using just three input/output ports, but eventually you end
up scaling back you designs.  Of course, you can always buy another RCX to
increase the number of ports, which will throw you back $200.  Adding a
multiplexor is such an easy and cost effective solution. I have seen several
designs on the web, but I dont know which one has both an ease of use
programming wise and is the most flexible....

Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
Of Brett Carver
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 2:20 AM
To: lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com; lugnet.robotics.rcx@lugnet.com
Subject: Re: Expanding the available input/output ports of the RCX


Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:
With only 3 input and 3 output ports, the RCX becomes quite
limiting after a while.  ...

How about coming up with creative solutions within the limits of
the hardware?  In the real world, you can't always make it bigger
and better, sometimes you have to do it another way.  It's a much
more interesting problem to "do it with only three inputs" that to
just "throw a multiplexer on it".  (IMHO of course :-)

--
                                               Brett Carver
                                               brett_carver@agilent.com
                                               (707) 577-4344



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Expanding the available input/output ports of the RCX
 
(...) How about coming up with creative solutions within the limits of the hardware? In the real world, you can't always make it bigger and better, sometimes you have to do it another way. It's a much more interesting problem to "do it with only (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)

8 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR