 | | Re: FSMs, coding techniques and other goodies
|
|
(...) I was thinking about that. The problem is that I lack the time... for the next couple of months, anyway... The idea of using a higher level language comes from the guess that it would be faster to develop than a graphical tool. Plus that it (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: FSMs, coding techniques and other goodies
|
|
Vlad, why don't you write a graphical FSM generator? Textbook FSMs are quite powerful, but in practice, states and transitions are usually augmented with enter/hold/leave actions. This provides plenty of configuration potential. Also, there's a (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Interactive C for the RCX?
|
|
Hi again! I was looking at the Handyboard, and thought whether it would be possible to port IC to the RCX. In my humble opinion, it would fit nicely between legOS and pbForth: the power of C and the interactivity of Forth; no fuss with egcs and gcc (...) (26 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | FSMs, coding techniques and other goodies
|
|
Hi all! I know that multitasking is reducing the need for using FSMs, but in my case the tasks ended being smaller FSMs after all, and because some parts were overlapping - why not use a single large FSM? [maybe it is my own fault that FSMs appear (...) (26 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty
|
|
What I don't understand is why does it still say RCX 1.0 on the plastic? The mold is obviously different, why diddn't they change the version stamp? KL (...) (26 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty
|
|
Jorge Rodriguez <rodriguez.136@osu.edu> wrote in message news:384b69a4.915347...net.com... (...) I was told by LEGO guys that it is totally gone and even the circuit board has been changed. You have to somehow feed power in as though it was coming (...) (26 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty
|
|
Did they take out the whole jack or just put on a new cover that hides it. (...) Jorge Rodríguez rodriguez.136@osu.edu (26 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | IR tower info
|
|
Hi all, As part of our current lego project we are trying to make a PC another node on a legOS network so that we can control robots from a PC. (the end goal I have in mind is a similarish interface to the RCXCC but that is a long way down the (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: PC <> RCX Communication?
|
|
(...) The op-code for sending a message is $F7 "set message". Unfortunately somehow it is left out of spirit.ocx, so you have to go down to the serial protocol in order to use it. See (URL) for the details. If you want to stick to spirit.ocx, you (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: PC <> RCX Communication?
|
|
Philippe jadin <philippe.jadin@skynet.be> wrote in message news:FLvD0J.106@lugnet.com... (...) written (...) can (...) features (...) That sounds exactly like what I have done here, although I have mounted the 'gantry' on a large base. At the moment (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
