 | | Re: Simplifying Cygwin & brickOS/leJOS
|
|
(...) been thinking that somebody should do this for quite some time now. I downloaded this package and installed it on my Windows 98 machine. Unfortunately, I have been having problems getting it to build the libraries. This is probably just a case (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: to analog as rcx is to programming plastic
|
|
(...) From offline: "It wouldn't be analog if you couldn't break it!". :-) Pat LaVarre (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC & fast firmware download
|
|
(...) Slow mode with the serial tower definitely was broken in BricxCC for a really long time because nobody ever reported to me that it was broken until about 2 or 3 weeks ago. I apologize for not noticing this problem on my own. Unfortunately, it (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC & fast firmware download
|
|
(...) Same for me. I'm using serial tower and 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 RCXs. Downloading from NQC works fine in both modes. Mario (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC & fast firmware download
|
|
(...) Have you ever tried using NQC to download the firmware? If so, does it work? Using RcxCC to download your firmware means you are stuck in the serial tower world and slow firmware downloading. Have you tried both slow and fast mode firmware (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC & fast firmware download
|
|
"John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message news:Hns82p.1ItF@lugnet.com... (...) latest (...) plugged (...) firmwares (...) attempts (...) but in (...) it (...) BricxCC? (...) 2.0 (...) I have never been able to get bricxCC to properly (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
|
(...) [snippage] (...) [more snippage] (...) Glad you like the chart. Trying to find a way to present the information in a useful manner was the trick for me, too. :-) I'll have to throw up a web page or something. As to figuring it out, credit has (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot for posting this very useful information, Mark! I don't know how long I've been beating my head against the brick trying to make heads or tails out of the values I calculated for the various possible combinations of button (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
|
(...) You're welcome! (...) Well, I did try it out and it does work... somewhat. For example, when you set the channel to 5 using the technique mentioned above, only some of the remote packets reflect 5 as the channel number, while others still (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC & fast firmware download
|
|
(...) I meant also to ask whether this is a new situation, i.e., whether BricxCC used to work but now it is broken or whether you have never had success with BricxCC. Thanks, John Hansen (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
