|
|
 | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| (...) Ah, thanks. Can we therefore conclude 45.8 ms/byte = 11/2400 s/byte for each byte of a burst? (...) Tell me more? Do we mean to say RCX in the middle of a football field echoes less well? Should I discard the echo, rather than checking it for (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| (...) Bingo! I reached the bricktools/ of the frame-free: (URL) bytes At a glance, I missed how bricxcc toggles x08 in the command op to let command ops be repeated, but I'd now guess the bricxcc algorithm for framing standard RCX replies is: 1) (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: How to use TowerApi.dll without TowerApi.lib
|
| Hi, again ! I am sorry. I uploaded the imperfect file. I changed the USB LEGO Tower setup and have examined in the state where it is not a standard. Already, I fixed the bug, please download again. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
| | | | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| Hi pat, (...) This is what you send reflected by the walls, I think. (...) Bits 0-2 of the opcode tells you the number, with 6 meaning 0 and 7 meaning 1. For some special opcodes it is longer. (...) + 1 start bit I think there's some Java code for (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| Unfortunately, it seems that TLC doesn't have a clear idea of what to do with Mindstorms in general. Their support for the whole line has been less than full - note the failure to update software for their cameras beyond Win98. I've been using the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| (...) This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| I wish I could give you a direct answer, but I don't know. However, I suspect (as I'm sure you do) that what you are looking for has already been done. Below are three possible sources which you can adopt, co-opt, or reverse-engineer to get where (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | green light to win
|
| (...) ... (...) Is exhausting the 9V of the IR tower transceiver a Windows only problem? When my `uname -a` reports: Linux Knoppix 2.4.19-xfs ... then the green LED light stays off til some software speaks IR. But in Win XP, the green LED light (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| (...) Thanks for the link, but I meant only to be asking: How do I make sense of RCX replies ... ... when the RCX is first powered and after I download Lego firmware. Help? Curiously, cluelessly, thankfully yours, Pat LaVarre P.S. Do we have no (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| (...) This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| (...) This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
| You might take apart javastorms: http:/www.javastorms.org They've implemented LNP using javax.comm. (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | frame RCX reply how
|
| Anybody know how to divide the bytes incoming from the RCX IR replies into correct frames, preferably using javax.comm on a Linux/Windows PC? I'm told I might want to: 1) Expect first an exact echo of the command packet. 2) Expect the reply code to (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Paul Kleniewski writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| "Bluey" <Wolf_and_eagle@spam...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:H9HpMG.DJs@lugnet.com... This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, David Koudys writes: In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| Stephane Simard ha scritto: In lugnet.robotics, David Koudys writes: In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, David Koudys writes: In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Save the RIS!
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Timothy Schroeder writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
