 | | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Me too- what he said, all of it. Mindstorms wouldn't be 1/16 as cool without BricxCC. But I just use it, I don't move stuff around. Tim (Smith) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) The whole BricxCC environment is the single most important feature making Mindstorms inherently usable for me. Thanks John, for all the work you've put into its (...) (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) I never use this. (...) Don't use it. Wouldn't miss it. (...) In any event, I really like BricxCC. Thank you for giving me something easy with which to program my RCXs! (18 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) No - I never use it. (...) Well I have used that to arrange the toolbars how I prefer, but I've no doubt I could get used to a different configuration fairly quickly, so no major objections there. (...) Well I don't use outlook, so I don't (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
I am revising the BricxCC GUI a bit and I would like to get some input from users. Do you care about docking toolbars to the left, right, or bottom of the BricxCC main window? In other words, would it bother you if that feature was removed? What (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LNPd with USB Tower - success?
|
|
Hi, lnpd is a very old program and has several problems, it does not support the protocol used by brickOS, lacks support for the USB tower and may lose packets as soon as they get too large (>8 bytes or so). Collision detection does not work as long (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) Looks like they are definitely not unique - I have a 1.0 number 016642 that is already listed by Mox in NZ. ROSCO (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) I have two of them, both marked as RCX 1.0, although only one has a power connector. The powered one is 041020, and the "plain" one is 432865. (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) Hoh! That is so cool! I would love to see it graphed. Someone should promote the adding of data to this. I had completely forgotten about it. When I got my first RCX, I remember being required to "register" it at the official website. But I (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there?
|
|
(...) It's right here: (URL) I have three entries in the list. (18 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
