 | | BricxCC release news
|
|
I continue to work on getting BricxCC ready for a new official release. My sincere apologies for not having one out at the beginning of the year as I had originally planned. Life keeps getting in the way. In any case, I have a new update to BricxCC (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) Neither of these work, although the second one does introduce a temporary for everything except for the 0 part. It will result in the display sometimes showing a value of zero. NQC tries really hard to use as few variables as it can so you (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the ideas! Actually these yielded some interesting results: a = 0 + ((x * 100) + y); occasionally yielded 0 (as expected), but never yielded anything other than 0 and the correct value (that I saw). a = ((x * 100) + y); and a = (x * (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) You may be able to work around this by using parenthesis (untested). a = ((x * 100) + y); or you might try a = 0 + ((x * 100) + y); John Hansen (URL) (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) That's the only way around it as far as I know. JB (19 years ago, 4-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
