 | | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
|
(...) Bingo! I reached the bricktools/ of the frame-free: (URL) bytes At a glance, I missed how bricxcc toggles x08 in the command op to let command ops be repeated, but I'd now guess the bricxcc algorithm for framing standard RCX replies is: 1) (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: How to use TowerApi.dll without TowerApi.lib
|
|
Hi, again ! I am sorry. I uploaded the imperfect file. I changed the USB LEGO Tower setup and have examined in the state where it is not a standard. Already, I fixed the bug, please download again. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | framing RCX LNP replies in Java
|
|
(...) Thanks I reached: src/org/javastorms/lnp/IR.java (...) I think I see ... readMsg accepts what it likes else dies after reading the first distasteful byte. readMsg likes either of xF0 or xF1, then a length byte, then that many bytes, then a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | command framing as seen from kernel/program.lrkey_handler
|
|
(...) Thanks for the tip, in reply here is a perhaps stunningly ignorant walkthru of how brickos frames standard commands, viewed by the newbie Me from kernel/program.lrkey_handler. The missing (key & -key) might interest people who haven't used (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
|
Hi pat, (...) This is what you send reflected by the walls, I think. (...) Bits 0-2 of the opcode tells you the number, with 6 meaning 0 and 7 meaning 1. For some special opcodes it is longer. (...) + 1 start bit I think there's some Java code for (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Save the RIS!
|
|
Unfortunately, it seems that TLC doesn't have a clear idea of what to do with Mindstorms in general. Their support for the whole line has been less than full - note the failure to update software for their cameras beyond Win98. I've been using the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Save the RIS!
|
|
(...) This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
|
I wish I could give you a direct answer, but I don't know. However, I suspect (as I'm sure you do) that what you are looking for has already been done. Below are three possible sources which you can adopt, co-opt, or reverse-engineer to get where (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | green light to win
|
|
(...) ... (...) Is exhausting the 9V of the IR tower transceiver a Windows only problem? When my `uname -a` reports: Linux Knoppix 2.4.19-xfs ... then the green LED light stays off til some software speaks IR. But in Win XP, the green LED light (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
|
(...) Thanks for the link, but I meant only to be asking: How do I make sense of RCX replies ... ... when the RCX is first powered and after I download Lego firmware. Help? Curiously, cluelessly, thankfully yours, Pat LaVarre P.S. Do we have no (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Save the RIS!
|
|
(...) This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Save the RIS!
|
|
(...) This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: frame RCX reply how
|
|
You might take apart javastorms: http:/www.javastorms.org They've implemented LNP using javax.comm. (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | frame RCX reply how
|
|
Anybody know how to divide the bytes incoming from the RCX IR replies into correct frames, preferably using javax.comm on a Linux/Windows PC? I'm told I might want to: 1) Expect first an exact echo of the command packet. 2) Expect the reply code to (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | brickOS in an Operating Systems Classroom
|
|
***...*** * brickOS in an Operating Systems Classroom * ***...*** Hi. I just want to report on a little project we did here at East Carolina University last semester. Although we never posted to this newsgroup for help, we need to thank you all for (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | make compiling error
|
|
When I try to compile my program I get this error: /course/cs148/bin/h8...hi-hms-gcc -O2 -fno-builtin - fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -I. -I/course/cs148/include -c sound.c /course/cs148/bin/h8...chi-hms-ld -T /course/cs148/lib/brickOS.lds -relax (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: [ brickos-Patches-668115 ] Make brickOS work with up-to-date Binutils
|
|
(...) https://sourceforge....5&group_id =58151 (...) Any comments on this? It would be nice to have this issue fixed in CVS. Max. (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RCXTTY-Variable Problem, calling ./firmdl3 ../boot/brickOS.srec
|
|
Absolutly, Thanks :-) (...) whether (...) setup. (...) something (...) newConf2 (...) a (...) _WIN32 (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Save the RIS!
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Paul Kleniewski writes: This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Save the RIS!
|
|
This may be a childish and stupid idea, but given the present news and rumors on how the RIS system is heading, I'd like to see how many RIS & RCX enthusiasts there are. Maybe if there are enough of us out there, we could sway LEGOs mind from (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
