To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 3144
3143  |  3145
Subject: 
command framing as seen from kernel/program.lrkey_handler
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:48:44 GMT
Viewed: 
4017 times
  
Subject: Re: frame RCX reply how
From: "Brian B. Alano" <throwaway@insightbb.com>
Newsgroups: lugnet.robotics.rcx
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 01:06:27 GMT

give you a direct answer, but I don't know ...

sources which you can adopt, co-opt, or
reverse-engineer to get where you are going ...

2. ...

Thanks for the tip, in reply here is a perhaps stunningly ignorant walkthru of
how brickos frames standard commands, viewed by the newbie Me from
kernel/program.lrkey_handler.

The missing (key & -key) might interest people who haven't used log2 & - to
isolate lsb's before.  The implications of "if a message, set message number
and exit" when only a message in part might interest a broader audience.


http://www.lugnet.com/jump.cgi?http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php%3Fgroup_id%3D58151
kernel/remote.c, kernel/lnp.c and program.c

Thanks, I reached: kernel/lnp.c kernel/remote.c kernel/program.c

Sorry to see the source less online than: http://lxr.linux.no/source/

Amused to see the downloader here now truncates to 31 chars the filename
"brickos-0.2.6.09.newConf2.tar.gz".

IR ... remote ... payload ... passed to ...
Normally, ... lrkey_handler() in program.c.

Thanks, I reached switch (key) case LRKEY_BEEP ...P5 ...P4 ...P3 ...P2 ...P1
...A1 ...A2 ...B1 ...B2 ...C1 ...C2.

The hex meant doesn't plainly appear in the .c, but `grep -r LRKEY include`
found include/remote.h: #define LRKEY_M1 ... LRKEY_BEEP to equal x1 .. x8000,
which at a glance precisely matches the big-endian ushort arg of a standard op
xD2 RemoteCommand payload.

lr_set_handler appears in include/remote.h also, being little more than a
creative name for {lr_handler =}.  `grep -r lr_handler include kernel` tells us
only kernel/remote.c cares.  remote.lr_process walks thru key_on = is & ~was,
key_off = was & ~is, not conventionally by progressively clearing each log2(key
& -key) but rather by if-testing each (key & (1 << n)).

remote.lr_process runs inside the main loop of remote.lr_thread once for each
wait_event(&lr_waitdata, 0), with the lr_keys bit-or of LRKEY values having
come from lr_data.

I guess we should disregard the comment:
unsigned int lr_data; // lnp data byte
unless there is some sense in which "byte" can mean 16 bits.

grep says nonzero lr_data comes from remote.lr_getdata, which is reached
indirectly, courtesy lnp_remote_set_handler of include/lnp/lnp.h setting
lnp_remote_handler.  Only kernel/lnp cares, specifically the
lnp.lnp_integrity_byte said to decode "LNP packets with a state machine".

Again the naming conventions obscure the meaning of such plain code as
{lnp_integrity_state++;}, but grep suggests include/lnp/sys/lnp.h, all together
implying brickos can receive standard op xD2 RemoteCommand #ifdef
CONF_RCX_PROTOCOL and standard op xF7 InternMessage #ifdef CONF_RCX_MESSAGE.
For example, LNPwaitRB0 = (LNPwaitRMH4 + 1).

Among other packets copied Out to the RCX from the PC, the lnp_integrity_state
sequences seemingly accept x 55 FF ~FF D2 ~D2 xx ~xx yy ~yy sum ~sum i.e. a
RemoteCommand packet, else reset to start fresh after any byte is wrong.

I'm not immediately confident that we mean what we wrote as kernel/lnp.c:

    case LNPwaitRCI: ...
     if (lnp_rcx_temp1 & 0x07)

I mean, I agree the comment is precisely correct as written: "// if a message,
set message number and exit".

But what I don't understand is why this is a Good Thing if the message came
from the remote.  I wonder why we choose to toss all other remote key key
press/release notifications whenever one of LRKEY_M1 LRKEY_M2 LRKEY_M3 is
pressed.  Just because premature optimisation is the root of all evil?  Or did
I misread some code?

Curiously, cluelessly, thankfully yours, Pat LaVarre



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: command framing as seen from kernel/program.lrkey_handler
 
(...) (URL) The missing (key & -key) might interest people who haven't used log2 & - to (...) number (...) and (...) log2(key (...) If I'm interpreting your shorthand correctly: there's no fast way to execute log2() on the H8 (i.e. no O(1) (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

5 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR