 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in) slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe the IR or (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
I'd be happy with a good "official" LEGO SONAR sensor and a fixed version of the LEGO Rotation Sensor (without the lost "clicks" bug) On the RCX side, I'd like a RCX 3.0 with 6+ sensor inputs and more outputs (and more RAM. I'm using MANAS sets to (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Converting a float to an integer
|
|
It looks like xdist and ydist are integers. You divide an integer by an integer, the answer is an integer. For example, if xdist=5 and ydist=10, you have 5/10, the answer is 0 (with a remainder of 5). So, if you do the multiply first, you will be (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Converting a float to an integer
|
|
I have built a plotter and want to draw a diagonal line of varying angles. It requires one motor to run slower then the other at a ratio based on the distance it has to travel compared to the other one. So I do something like this xspeed = (int) (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: A very Power Tool
|
|
(...) For all of the virus creators and senders out there: if there's one thing worse than a witless script kiddie, it's a scum-sucking virus propagator. Send all of the viruses to me that you want. They'll just go to my 10GB bit-bucket. Loosers... (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | A very Power Tool
|
|
Do NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT!! It is a virus. It has been making the rounds, it is the KLEZ virus. Thought you all might want to know. Tim Burt (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
Thanks, it seems to work much better now. Very quick turn-around time, I appreciate that. You've done an excellent job putting this Forth together, thank you for your efforts. David (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
