 | | Re: A very Power Tool
|
|
(...) For all of the virus creators and senders out there: if there's one thing worse than a witless script kiddie, it's a scum-sucking virus propagator. Send all of the viruses to me that you want. They'll just go to my 10GB bit-bucket. Loosers... (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | A very Power Tool
|
|
Do NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT!! It is a virus. It has been making the rounds, it is the KLEZ virus. Thought you all might want to know. Tim Burt (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
Thanks, it seems to work much better now. Very quick turn-around time, I appreciate that. You've done an excellent job putting this Forth together, thank you for your efforts. David (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: egcs compiler - float problems?
|
|
(...) I have not tried to compile this, but one thing that looks suspicious is that you are using doubles. Doubles are not supported. The compiler I have (some old version of GCC) treats doubles and floats as the same type. The compiler you're using (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
The new 2.1.3 Version of pbForth has only minor fixes thanks to the investigative efforts of David Rojas and Rob Harvey. They were able to provide detailed, reproducible bug reports, which makes fixing bugs so much easier. Thanks guys! Here's what (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | egcs compiler - float problems?
|
|
Can someone using the egcs compiler suite test the following code? It seems it doesn't compile under egcs. int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { double foo = 1.0; return foo > 0.1 ? 0 : 1; } Compiles fine under gcc 3.0.3. Regards, Michael (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | More problems with floats
|
|
When I try to compile a program containing the following function: bool tr_guard_foo_loc2_t0() { return getVarVal(&var_foo_cl) >= 0.1; } I get this error: /tmp/ccyEbqnS.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccyEbqnS.s:237: Error: cannot create floating-point (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: semaphores
|
|
Would it be possible for you to send the entire source? I would like to see how it interacts with the rest of the program. Thanks for your help. "kenneth johansen" <kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no> wrote in message news:3CDAC372.34D72C....uit.no... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: ___cmpsi2
|
|
(...) OK, I planned to test 0.2.6; this is the right moment to do it. (...) Do you know why? (I'm just curious) (...) Thank you very much. This was really important to me. Eric (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Apparent 'time-out'
|
|
(...) Rob, Thanks for this. I think I'll be able to get to this tonight. I'll have a good look at what is going on. Cheers, Ralph (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | FW: Apparent 'time-out'
|
|
(...) Have you seen the articles I recently wrote here... (URL) Cheers, Ralph (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: ___cmpsi2
|
|
(...) Don't know. Just made a quick download from sourceforge. Didn't install, just looked through with mc. Seems that in the mint-lib, both cmp2-files are missing. And no printf in the c library path. Regards, Michael (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Apparent 'time-out'
|
|
(...) Yes, the flashlight consistently makes the RCX go "dead". (...) No rush. PATIENT: "Doctor, it really hurts when I move my arm like this." DOCTOR: "Then don't move your arm like that." (...) I look forward to the article. I am currently working (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: ___cmpsi2
|
|
(...) How did *that* happen?!!?!? Just curious. Somebody should point a finger, just for yuks. -Kekoa (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Apparent 'time-out'
|
|
(...) OK, so if the RCX is in the "dead" state, shutting down the GUI and restarting the GUI makes no difference. And you can always clobber the RCX running pbForth by shining a light at it? I'll see what I can do on this end to reproduce the (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Apparent 'time-out'
|
|
Shutting down the GUI and starting it back up has no effect, pbForth continues to respond correctly. Adding words to the dictionary doesn't seem to make any difference either. Whether having just uploaded the firmware or having the RCX active for (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: semaphores
|
|
a short example: #include <semaphore.h> // for semaphore opperations // global buffer, used to store incoming messages. // the buffer is checked by the application waiting for the message. struct inn_msg{ char *msg; sem_t lock; }; //create a (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Apparent 'time-out'
|
|
(...) Thanks... (...) When the RCX is sitting idle, the pbForth interpreter is spinning and looking for characters from the IR. I doubt that sunlight (or flashlight) would be interpreted as valid chars, and the error handling should just discard the (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
