 | | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) This is BIG NEWS and GREAT exposure for Markus and friends!!! -- a major business magazine recognizing the pursuits and achievements of adult LEGO fanatics on the net to extend the RCX technology toward greater heights! In May, Forbes also had (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I remember that! But aren't you supposed to do it mod 255 for maximum effectiveness? Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | TIMER 0 is flakey
|
|
Hi Ralph, It looks like TIMER 0 is hosed in v1.05. Take a gander at this: ----- : time RCX_INIT 0 0 TIMER_SET 32 0 DO 0 TIMER_GET . LOOP ; ok time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 -32639 -32639 130 130 -32638 131 131 131 -32637 132 132 132 133 -32635 (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
Hi, I'm kinda new to LUGNET, so if I get this wrong - sorry! I'm interested in this LNP idea that seemed to be floating around a few months ago. Is it still alive, and if so what state has it got to? I would be grateful if someone can post or e-mail (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Do the high resolution timers work?
|
|
Hi Ralph, Are timer_SET and timer_GET working? I can't seem to get any non-zero values from them: RCX_INIT ok 0 FFFF timer_SET ok 0 timer_GET . 0 ok Am I missing something? Thanks, Jonathan (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
Check it out here- brief, and unfortunately no URLs, but... (URL) (who is only slightly hurt that his documentation wasn't mentioned :) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | better test value for touch sensors
|
|
FYI: The simple-rover example uses an unsafe test value for touch sensors. Touch sensor should be tested against <0xf000, NOT <0x2000 (e.g. simple-rover.c) Reason: Not pressed has a constant value >0xf000. Pressed varies depending on battery change, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | The IR FIX -- was: Re: Is IR considered broken?
|
|
(...) I had the same problem. (...) Here's the fix: enclode the old handler code in #ifdef TRASH, use the new #else part. I'll say a few things about the motivation below. (If you prefer to patch, download (URL) it's based on LegOS 0.1.7 but should (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Laser Pointers
|
|
Are they legal in UK? Any Help Appreciated (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
The Mindstorms RCX Code software does the exact same thing as the code you listed, the only caveat is I think RCX Code uses power settings from 1 to 8 while NQC uses 0 to 7. Both result in the same bytecodes for the RCX to interpret. // turn A on (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC emulator?
|
|
The idea has cropped up from time to time, but nobody has written one yet. You probably don't want to simulate NQC code, but rather interpret the bytecodes emitted by the NQC compiler. These are just the bytecodes of the standard Lego firmware. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensors?
|
|
Thanks Mark, those changes got rotation-sensor.c working for me. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | NQC emulator?
|
|
Hello, it seems that the LegOS people have an emulator so that one can test programs "virtually", i.e. on your PC rather than the real RCX. Is there something similar available on the NQC side? (I need to kill the time until the Mindstorm kit (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
But how does the original mindstorms software do it. With the Mindstorms software you can set the speed of each motor and it is obviously different. I must be missing something. I did a search on lugnet and found some NQC code to drive the motors (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: rcxhttpd?
|
|
You could use a terminal server and at leaset telnet to the rcx. KL (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
The RCX uses pulse-width modulation to control power to the motor. The pulses are between 1ms and 8ms of power during an 8ms interval. In theory, this would result in different power being provided to the motor. The problem is that the motor has an (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: rcxhttpd?
|
|
(...) LOL! I like it! (...) [other protocols snipped] (...) Yes I am! Now, to convince the department that we _really_ need 1000 more Mindstorm kits as a fall-back for e-mail in case the net goes down. ;) jack (envisioning a building full of roving (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
I think that output power effects the modulation of the motor power. The motor power cycles on and off with the off time being longer at lower power settings. As David stated, this results in the same speed of the motor when it is unloaded for all (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
I've had the same result. It seems an **unloaded** motor always runs at full speed. To explain it to myself, I've theorized that the 'p' (power) in Fwd() and OutputPower() is more akin to force and does not directly control velocity. Waiting for (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: emulegOS: a new release
|
|
Just a note about a small bug. The supplied sample program ir-rover.cpp doesn't work on the real RCX. I think this may be due to IR complications under legOs. I'm working on a version which will work on both the emulator and the real system and will (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
