|
|
 | | More LNP Issues
|
| Thanks to Rainer for helping me with the stupid compiler bug :) Now that the PC side of LNP is working, I'm having troubles with the RCX side... I've modified the LNP sample provided on the WinLNP page as follows (with the includes trimmed): #define (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Question for John Barnes
|
| hi John, Some time ago there was a discussion about keeping the IR-tower alive. I want to keep the IR-tower alive, for fast data transport from RCX to PC. You mentioned that you had drawn the circuit diagram, but you never published it. Do you have (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Hmmm, it seems to be correctly passing -TRCX2 on the command line in my testing. I haven't actually tested with a brick containing the RCX2 firmware, but when I put an RCX2-only command in a program it compiles fine when I've selected RCX2 but (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) With the amount of work you have put in on this it should be I who apologizes for pestering you. I tried the most recent version. It is correctly finding the nqc compiler now. Unfortunately it doesn't appear to be passing the correct command (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Whoops. I was assuming that since Mark's version put NQC in the same directory as RcxCC everyone was using the NQC in the same directory. I hadn't tried it differently myself. So in one of my past revisions I stuck a path on the front of the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
