 | | Fast data acquistion on PC from RCX ?
|
|
I want to do fast data acquistion (100 samples/second) continuously with the RCX and transport the data in realtime to a PC. I'm building a oscilloscope to monitor sensors and globals variables on the PC, a bit like "Mr. Sensor Program" (URL) was (...) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
(...) Well I'm glad you apologized. :) I just finished downloading and testing your previous version only to find that there is even a newer one. I really like the new editing features BTW. The multilevel undo and the line numbers are a great (...) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
(...) Okay, another round of fixes/modifications. Sorry I'm making these changes so fast. I am *really* interested in hearing from anyone who is trying out my revised RcxCC, by the way. :-) Anyway, this version (available from the link above) (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Wishlist leJOS
|
|
Hi! I'm a leJos newbie, but at a glance, I miss the logging functions that I think NQC has, the ability to store numbers in the RCX for later upload. Is ther a chance that it will be implemented ? At least I would appreciate it Björn Lundin (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Which way is faster?
|
|
By "fastest", I assume you mean the smallest worst case latency between a condition happening and the RCX responding to it. Option #2 has the drawback that while the RCX is responding to one condition, it won't be looking for the other ones. So the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Which way is faster?
|
|
I want to know which way is faster: 1. Use three tasks to watch sensors task watch1() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } task watch2() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } task watch3() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } 2. Use one task with multi (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Dynamic lists allowed?
|
|
(...) Thanks for your help. The program is running fine now. Would you happen to know if anyone has created this sort of high level functions? If not more people might be interested. jm (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
Anyone who is interested in trying my revised RcxCC can find a copy at: (URL) just uploaded another revision that implements several new features: 1) command line switches: /? or /help = display a help message on startup before continuing /COM=N = (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Dynamic lists allowed?
|
|
(...) This should be "struct tNode *next;" (...) After this, any time you want to refer to a tNode, you need to say "struct tNode". Or you can put "typedef struct tNode tNode" and then use the "tNode" as a type like you're doing. (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Dynamic lists allowed?
|
|
Since I just got started with legOs (thanks to 'Extreme Mindstorms'), I'm creating a set of high level utility functions. This one here is intended to display a DYNAMIC list of values, but there seems to be a problem with the use of 'struct' and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
