 | | Re: text location for apps and q?
|
|
(...) I just have to ask why you're doing this, just for the heck of it? I mean, the output device you're writing two can hold a whopping five characters at a time. I don't really see the benefit of changing to a more complicated interface. Of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: text location for apps and q?
|
|
(...) when i remove -O from my Makefile the kernel grew bigger, and crossed 0xb000, so i changed it accordingly, and that didn't work. so i guess there is 16k limitation for kernel and user program. (...) too bad, but there's not much to work on (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: text location for apps and q?
|
|
(...) hehehe... (...) my (...) it's from www.nogs.de/legos i think. but it doesn't really matter since i've compiled 2.95.2 and the new binutils. imel (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Monitor() and Event()
|
|
(...) The "monitor" control structure (as well as "acquire") is a very useful supplement of the existing control structures, such as "if", "while", "until", etc. Dave Baum already gave an example and with the following I also want to point out a (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 2.0 - when, where, what??
|
|
(...) If I remember correctly it was posted to the Mindstorms Web site briefly... I've told all I know about it. (...) My hope is that the new firmware part in ROM will contain Hardware support for new Sensors. Proximity, Compass etc... Hey, I can (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
