 | | RE: Using CAN to Have More Than 3 Motors/Sensors
|
|
(...) Mark! This is great work! I am always impressed when someone goes beyond wishing for stuff that LEGO did not provide us with and then actually builds a working model. Your idea of a modular motor/input module is one of the great benefits of (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: New to PBforth - a few questions
|
|
Hi David, (...) Actually the power difference is hard to notice, regardless of platform. The different power levels are achieved using pulse width modulation, but something about the motors (maybe the flywheels) means that it's hard to notice much (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) In active mode, the value you read from the light sensor depends on how you power the sensor and read the A/D converters. In particular, the delay from the time you turn off the power to the sensor to the time you do A/D conversion matters. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | light sensor problem?
|
|
Ok, so i'm supposed to be the guru, but I don't get it: all my light sensors are currently showing a range of adjusted values between 60-310, instead of the 20-110 that I'm used to seeing. The sensor is in active mode (passive mode still shows (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
|
(...) Maybe your reply got sent to the cyber-trash, too. I never saw my post or any replies. (...) Yeah, pretty simple. Hopefully there won't be too many other instances in the kernel, and they're all one-liners to fix. (...) Well, I'll probably (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
