 | | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) We must have the same twisted sense of humor since the necessity of putting it in the FAQ pretty much tipped the scales for me. ObvertOutput() it is! Dave p.s. We'll see if I'm still laughing when people start e-mailing me about it. (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Dumb VB question
|
|
In manual it says that input has to be string, then activeX control parses it and searches for numbers 0,1,2. So perhaps you should define those constants explicitly as strings instead of using variants. "Ben Erwin" <ben@alum.mit.edu> wrote in (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Dumb VB question
|
|
"Ben Erwin" <ben@alum.mit.edu> wrote in message news:FwHKu9.2I1@lugnet.com... (...) how (...) "OUTPUT_AOUTPUT_BOUTPUT_C" (...) This is just a guess, but how about OUTPUT_A + OUTPUT_B + OUTPUT_C . (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) It's a bit obscure, but a perfectly good word -- the opposite of invert. It means to turn something forward, as opposed to invert, which is to turn something backward. (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) I never heard that word before. Jürgen (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) That sounds like a reason to use it right there. :) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) Yes it is a great description of the actual function, however I feel the word is a bit obscure and that's why I hesitate about using it. That's what the "not sure" is...Obvert technically means the right thing, but perhaps isn't obvious to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Dumb VB question
|
|
If using the constants OUTPUT_A, OUTPUT_B, OUTPUT_C instead of "012" ... how can you refer to multiple outputs in one command? "OUTPUT_AOUTPUT_BOUTPUT_C" certainly doesn't work, and neither do "OUTPUT_A,OUTPUT_B,OUTPUT_C" or "OUTPUT_A OUTPUT_B (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: New to legOS, can you get it seperately?
|
|
(...) It is free, but it won't do you much good without an RCX- to the best of my knowledge it won't run on anything else. (...) It's not really another type of C- just a different set of libraries. Other than that, same old C. -Luis (...) ---...--- (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
