 | | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) That sounds like a reason to use it right there. :) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) Yes it is a great description of the actual function, however I feel the word is a bit obscure and that's why I hesitate about using it. That's what the "not sure" is...Obvert technically means the right thing, but perhaps isn't obvious to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Dumb VB question
|
|
If using the constants OUTPUT_A, OUTPUT_B, OUTPUT_C instead of "012" ... how can you refer to multiple outputs in one command? "OUTPUT_AOUTPUT_BOUTPUT_C" certainly doesn't work, and neither do "OUTPUT_A,OUTPUT_B,OUTPUT_C" or "OUTPUT_A OUTPUT_B (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: New to legOS, can you get it seperately?
|
|
(...) It is free, but it won't do you much good without an RCX- to the best of my knowledge it won't run on anything else. (...) It's not really another type of C- just a different set of libraries. Other than that, same old C. -Luis (...) ---...--- (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) PS -- I'm not really as fanatical about this as I may seem. I'll be happy either way. (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) It's a perfectly good word! (It's not in M-W, but OED has it. And M-W has "obverse"....) :) And, it describes exactly what you want. (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) I was thinking of RestoreOutput myself, but then I was wondering if it implied restoring the enable/disable state as well. I'd like to keep the calls 'paired' as much as possible... EnableOutput / DisableOutput InvertOutput / ???Output I know (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Hi guys I found this tutorial about SDL. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: VB Upload Problem
|
|
I have source coding sample of it, www.pronerd.com/lego should have a link, else goto my old page, (URL) Rutkas Faith in Chaos www.PRONERD.com -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Ben (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
|
Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote: You can't do this: (...) You probably meant char *d2 = dest; like the original author wrote. Here also: (...) You probably meant return dest; like the original author wrote. -Kekoa (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
|
(...) I don't know of any leaks, but this line includes the terminating \0 in the output string: (...) Try the following instead: while (*d2) d2++; Presumably if you allocated a buffer of exactly the right size for a correct strcat, you code would (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: memory leak in string handling
|
|
(...) But strcat isn't implemented in legOS is it? At least I had trouble finding it when I needed it to use in a random number generator. But this was in 0.2.3, so I don't know about 0.2.4. Tobias (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
Just had to add my two cents worth; NegateOutput RestoreOutput JB (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) What's wrong with Obvert? (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | memory leak in string handling
|
|
This is not, as far as I know, something that is the matter with legos, but rather with my C programming skills. I'm trying to write the function strcat, but apparantly I'm losing memory somewhere. If anyone can see any apparant leak, please let me (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) How about DontInvertOutput? Not beautiful, but IMHO clearer. Jürgen (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
